AV1 vs VP9 vs H.264
Updated: 11/13/2025
Codec Comparison
H.264
Universal support
Fast to encode
Larger sizes
VP9
Better efficiency
Good web support
Slower encode
AV1
Best efficiency
Growing support
Slowest encode
Related articles
- H.264/H.265/AV1 Parameter Tuning for Practical CompressionA hands‑on overview of key parameters across H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and AV1, with compatibility tips, bitrate controls, and example recipes aligned with Vibbit workflows.CompressionCodecH.264H.265AV1
- CRF Basics: Picking the Right Quality LevelUnderstand Constant Rate Factor (CRF), typical ranges and trade‑offs.CompressionCRFQuality
- PSNR/SSIM Metrics and Subjective Quality: How to Use ThemExplain what PSNR and SSIM measure, why they can disagree with perception, and how to combine metric checks with human review to make solid compression decisions for Vibbit workflows.CompressionQualityPSNRSSIMEvaluation
- Two‑Pass Encoding vs. CRF: When to Use EachClear, practical guidance for Vibbit users on choosing between two‑pass bitrate targeting and CRF quality targeting, with trade‑offs, constraints, and recommended settings for reliable delivery.CompressionCRFTwo‑PassBitrateDelivery